Legal Opinion
Vance v. Chapman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1928No. 7664PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error, receiver of the National Bank of Commerce in Shawnee, Okl., brings suit against defendant in error on two causes of action; the first, to recover on a promissory note for the principal sum of $5,646.66, and, tho second, to recover as for stockholder’s liability on 50 shares of the capita] stock of said hank. The answer admitted the execution of the note, but alleged that it was made for accommodation of the hank, and was without consideration; denied that defendant in error was a stockholder in said bank; and, in general, denied all…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fricke v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- McCuing v. BovayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Brown v. CarverCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Momand v. Paramount Publix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Murray Hospital v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.