Legal Opinion
Cudahy Packing Co. v. City of Omaha
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1928No. 7478PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
In 1903 the Legislature of the state of Nebraska passed an act (Laws 1903, e. 17) which, in effect, required the city of Omaha to buy or build a system of waterworks. The plant in Omaha, embracing works in South Omaha, was then owned and operated by the Omaha Water Company. March 2, 1903, engineers were appointed to appraise the value of said system of waterworks as a preliminary to the purchase thereof by the city. June 1, 1904, the Omaha Water Company entered into a contract with the Cudahy Packing Company, under the terms of which plaintiff in error was to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. BreitlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cheffey v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reliable Auto Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- In Re Bills of ExceptionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- George J. Gallon v. The Lloyd-Thomas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.