Legal Opinion

Nevada Pay TV v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1986No. 15528PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

Petitioners are the defendants in an action pending below. Pursuant to SCR 48.1, they filed a peremptory challenge in the district court against the respondent judge, the Honorable John F. Mendoza. Judge Mendoza entered an order striking the challenge on the ground that it was untimely. Petitioners contend, however, that the judge was required to transfer the matter to another department; they assert that he lacked jurisdiction to strike their challenge. Accordingly, petitioners bring this original petition, seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the transfer and a writ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. ConforteDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1978
  3. Jacobson v. Manfredi by ManfrediNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Welfare Division v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Towbin Dodge, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Matter of Discipline of DrozNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. A CAB, LLC v. MURRAYNevada Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API