Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Thompson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1983No. 14462PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner is the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit pending in the district court. Instead of answering the complaint, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the suit based on the statute of limitations. See NRCP 12(b)(5). The district court denied the motion to dismiss, and petitioner now seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to dismiss the suit.1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

A writ of mandamus may be issued by this court to compel the performance of an act which the law requires as a duty *360resulting from an office, trust…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poulos v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Kussman v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Holloway v. BarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1979

4Cited by91 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BabayanNevada Supreme Court · 1990

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API