State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Thompson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner is the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit pending in the district court. Instead of answering the complaint, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the suit based on the statute of limitations. See NRCP 12(b)(5). The district court denied the motion to dismiss, and petitioner now seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to dismiss the suit.1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
A writ of mandamus may be issued by this court to compel the performance of an act which the law requires as a duty *360resulting from an office, trust…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Poulos v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Kussman v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Holloway v. BarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1979
4Cited by91 opinions
- Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BabayanNevada Supreme Court · 1990
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.