Kudatsky v. Tyler Technologies
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 AARON KUDATSKY, on behalf of himself, and on behalf of those similarly- 10 situated, No. C 19-07647 WHA 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. ORDER RE MOTION FOR FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND 13 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 14 Defendant. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this wage-and-hour class action, defendant technology company allegedly 18 misclassified employees, depriving them of overtime and other wages. Parties now move for 19 final approval of their settlement and plaintiffs move for attorneys’ fees and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Mego Financial Corporation Securities Litigation Christopher Dunleavy A. Peyser v. Michael Nadler v. Robert Nederlander Jerome J. Cohen Herbert B. Hirsch Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.