Legal Opinion

Roatch v. Puera

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1995No. C8-94-2430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Kevin C. Puera appeals from a judgment that established his paternity and child support obligation for two children, J.A.R. (born 3/1/79) and H.L.R. (born 11/12/85), and divided his real and personal property with Sandra K. Roatch, his live-in companion.

FACTS

Puera and Roatch started dating when he was fourteen and she was twenty years old. In 1979, their first child was born out of wedlock. In 1983, Roatch and their child moved into Puera’s one-bedroom trailer, which was located on five acres of land previously given to Puera by his mother.

In 1985, the parties purchased a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Estate of EriksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. United States v. Kenneth Paul HollisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Obert v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re Estate of PalmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re Estate of PalmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API