In Re Estate of Palmen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.*
Appellant challenges the dismissal of her claim against respondent estate. Appellant and decedent had lived together as an unmarried couple. Appellant argues that she was entitled to a portion of the estate because of the money and labor she invested in a cabin owned by the decedent.
FACTS
Appellant Deborah L. Schneider and decedent John M. Palmen lived together outside of marriage and had sexual relations for 11 years. During that time, Palmen purchased property upon which the couple built a cabin; all documentation regarding the property was in Palmen’s name…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Estate of EriksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hollom v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of PalmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Obert v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Estate of PalmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998