Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Paul Hollister

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1984No. 84-5032PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

Kenneth Hollister appeals from his jury conviction of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1982). Hollister raises several issues on appeal: he asserts that the district judge (1) erred in excluding relevant evidence; (2) denied Hollister a fair trial in giving the jury improper instructions, (3) required an excessive bond, and (4) erred in declining to disqualify himself from the trial.

Facts

On September 28, 1983, Hollister, age 20, and Roger Miller, age 49, robbed the Brooklyn Park Bank. Hollister and Miller had known each other for approximately nine years;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Kentucky v. WhortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Leland Patzner v. Joyce Burkett A/K/A Joyce McLaughlin Deborah Myerchin and Stutsman County, North Dakota, a Political SubdivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Carlos SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Medical Service Ass'n of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Tyson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. United States v. Frederick W. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API