Legal Opinion

Hendershot v. Ferkel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1944No. 29705PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question presented, the answer to which is determinative of this case, is whether the judgment against the defendant Ferkel upon which the supplemental petition against the defendant Motorists Mutual Insurance Company is predicated was void. The answer of the Court of Appeals was in the affirmative.

If that judgment is valid it has become final. In any event, the right of the defendant Motorists Mutual Insurance Company or Clarence Ferkel to offer additional evidence dehors the record as to the validity .of that judgment is terminated. In the absence of fraud the validity thereof must be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Henry L. Doherty & Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. State ex el. Nelson v. GrimmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Feuchtbaum v. ConstantiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Stephenson v. Duriron CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1968
  3. Kraft v. BahrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Hicks v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Williams v. EganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API