Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 17, 1955No. 36506PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORN, Justice.
The matter herein presented arises out of bur statutes relating to actions against nonresident users and operators of motor vehicles upon the public highways of this state. See 47 O.S.1951 §§ 391-403. The question has not been the subject of consideration heretofore in this jurisdiction.
The statutory provisions, sometimes referred to as the Nonresident Motorists Service Act, require that non-residents entering the state and using the highways shall be deemed to have agreed the Secretary of State shall be service agent for service of process in civil actions for damages arising…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hendershot v. FerkelOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Chaney v. ReddinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Powell v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wayne Kitchens v. Bryan County National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Letteer v. Conservancy District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Nikwei v. Ross School of Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Mary Ruth Moore v. William Bell Dunham, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Lebus v. CardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.