Feuchtbaum v. Constantini
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Wehíteaub, C. J.
These actions arise out of automobile accidents and have the common feature that the defendant, a resident of our State at the time of the occurrence, thereafter disappeared and could not be served with process by any of the usual modes of service. Hence plaintiffs asked leave to make service another way. In LaGreca v. Hars, plaintiff sought to serve defendant by service on defendant’s insurance carrier. The trial court denied the application. In Feuchtbaum v. Constantini and Magahan v. Erspamer, there being no insurance coverage,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Krueger v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for TheNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- Hartwell v. MarquezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Felicetta v. COMMERCIAL UNION INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.