Legal Opinion

Hoy v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1976No. 82468, CA 6717PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Plaintiff filed this action for damages allegedly caused by defendants’ negligence. Defendants moved for summary judgment, claiming that prior litigation between the parties 1 was a bar to the present action under the res judicata or collateral estoppel doctrine. The trial court denied the motion for summary judgment. 2 Defendants filed notice of appeal. Plaintiff has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that an order denying a motion for summary judgment is not appealable.

Oregon’s recently enacted summary judgment statute (Oregon Laws 1975, ch 106, p 92, codified as ORS 18.105) is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moran v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Meyers v. BurwellOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hoy v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hoffman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Washington County National Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SpeerstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API