Legal Opinion

Moran v. Lewis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit contesting defendants’ right to log certain property. The trial court enjoined the defendants from logging on the property pending the determination of the lawsuit.

ORS 32.020 requires an undertaking to be filed when an injunction is issued during the pendency of a lawsuit. The trial court did not require an undertaking. The defendants appeal contending the injunction order is void as no undertaking was required. Plaintiffs moved to dismiss contending the injunction order was not an appealable order.

Ordinarily, an order for an injunction pending the determination of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Milton J. Wershow Co. v. McVeety MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Salem King's Products Co. v. La FolletteOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hoy v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Lane Council of Governments v. Lane Council of Government Employes Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lulay v. EarleOregon Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API