Legal Opinion

Hoy v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1975No. 80070, CA 4545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLANGrTRY, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of an automobile accident allegedly caused by defendants’① negligence in (1) failing to close to public travel the intersection at which the accident occured when they

* * knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known * * *

“* * * [that it had been] made dangerous by the accumulation of snow in such quantities as to completely obscure the highway signs and highway surface road markings * *(2) causing snow removal equipment to clear roadways in such a manner as to obscure highway signs and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. YantOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Armstrong v. StegenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Stanich v. BUCKLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hoagland v. SolieOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Eggiman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoy v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Fischer v. KombolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API