Legal Opinion
In re the Claim Ubl
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 8, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 20, 2006, which ruled that claimant was *1022disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a boat salesperson for the employer for approximately 18 months. He resigned in December 2005 citing the employer’s reduction of his work hours. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.
We affirm.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re EbisikeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re DeGennaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Rial (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023