Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Diolosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 29, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 17, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, a bookkeeper, left his employment after a confrontation with his employer over the manner in which claimant took telephone messages. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant challenges the Board’s decision arguing, inter alia, that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of PegasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API