Legal Opinion
In re Schwartz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 8, 2008, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a paralegal aide, voluntarily left his employment without good cause. “Neither general dissatisfaction with working conditions nor the inability to get along with a difficult coworker [has] been found to constitute good cause for leaving one’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of AyadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of TedescoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of AugustusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MatterofKatz[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014