McGrath v. Bradley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action for quiet title, claiming that they had established a prescriptive easement for a driveway across defendants’ property. Defendants responded that plaintiffs and their predecessors used the driveway in question by permission and, thus, that their use could not have ripened into a prescriptive easement. Defendants also asserted that, even if plaintiffs and their predecessors had established a prescriptive easement, it had been extinguished by defendants’ and their predecessors’ adverse use of the easement. The trial court ruled in favor of plaintiff McGrath,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Coventon v. SeufertOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Trewin v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoffman v. DorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hisey v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- 7455 Inc. v. Tuala Northwest, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Wels v. HippeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Sander v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- McGrath v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.