Remainders, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to vacate its order setting aside a default of real parties in interest entered by its clerk.
The order made by the court is not appealable and hence mandamus is a proper remedy if the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction or abused its discretion in entering that order.
The relevant facts are: Petitioner commenced an action against real parties in interest and others, and service of process was made upon real parties in interest. Petitioner extended the time for real parties in interest to plead to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- McDonald v. SeveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A & B METAL PRODUCTS v. MacArthur Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Forbes v. Cameron Petroleums, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Harlan v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Brown v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983