Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Cameron Petroleums, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1978No. Civ. 52503PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, J.
Plaintiff James Forbes appeals from an order of the superior court quashing the service of the summons upon defendants Cameron Petroleums, Inc., and Harold B. Brett, and, in the alternative (in the event that the quashing of service of summons be held erroneous), granting defendants’ motion to stay proceedings on the grounds of inconvenient forum.
The order also vacated the default of defendants entered September 1, 1976, “on the grounds of excusable neglect by defendants.”
The complaint was for breach of contract for money had and received, and for an accounting. It was based…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Benson v. Kwikset Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re Marriage of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Brown v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.