Ten Broeck Tyre Co. v. Rubber Trading Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Third Division).
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner —
Affirming on appeal of Rubber Trading Company and reversing on appeal of Ten Broeck Tyre Company.
*528By contract dated February 24, 1916, the Rubber Trading Company of New York City sold, to the Ten Broeck Tyre Company of Louisville, twelve tons (2,240 pounds each) of prime ribbed smoked sheet rubber at eighty-seven and one-half cents per pound for successive deliveries in quantities of four tons each after arrival in New York during the months of April, May and June. The terms of payment were, “Sight draft against B/L.” Thereafter, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hanson & Parker, Ltd. v. WittenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Samuel M. Lawder & Sons Co. v. AlBert MacKie Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Charles v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Newton v. Bayless Fruit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marx v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- O'Bryan v. Mengel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- National Seed Co. v. LeavellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Pacific Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.