Legal Opinion

Marx v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1936No. 10571PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge,

Appellant and two others, Clarence H. Landwehr and Otto Villwock, were indicted in an indictment containing three counts, the first and second counts charging a violation of the Liquor Taxing Act of 1934, § 201 (26 U.S.C.A. § 1152a), while the third count charged a conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States in violation of the Criminal Code, § 37 '(18 U.S.C.A. § 88). We shall refer to the parties as they were designated in the lower court.

The first count charged in substance that the defendants on the 20th day of Dec’ember, 1934, unlawfully, willfully,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Feigenbutz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. De ClowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Globe Milling Co. v. Minneapolis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Isaacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Gabriel Parra LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Abraham L. Koolish, David F. Koolish and John B. Carnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API