Legal Opinion
Samuel M. Lawder & Sons Co. v. AlBert MacKie Grocery Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 1, 1903PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.
The appellee sued the appellant for breach of a contract which is set out in the declaration as follows :
“Baltimore, May 24th, 1901.
“ Bought of Samuel M. Lawder & Sons Company, Baltimore, Maryland, for account of Albert Mackie Grocer Company, Limited, New Orleans, La., seven hundred (700) cases, two pound, Quail Tomatoes, at fifty-two and one-half cents per dozen. Terms cash, Jess one and one-half per cent. Buyer to give shipping instructions when requested by seller. To be delivered as packed during the season of T901. F. o. b. Baltimore. Brokers Thompson & Fowler, New Orleans, La.
“Accepted.
“…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley v. William Mason & Son ex rel. BirckheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Baltimore Base Ball Club & Exhibition Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Gibney v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. Thomas H. White & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
3Cited by19 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Eaton v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Ten Broeck Tyre Co. v. Rubber Trading Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Standard Scale & Supply Co. v. Baltimore Enamel & Novelty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Phœnix Iron & Steel Co. v. Wilkoff Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.