Legal Opinion

Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1966No. 44,387PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract. The plaintiffs have appealed from a summary judgment entered in their favor for $34,060.00, and the defendant has filed a cross-appeal. For the sake of clarity, we shall refer to the parties as plaintiffs, on the one hand, and defendant on the other.

While the questions presented both on appeal and cross-appeal pertain to the subject of damages, a brief history of the case, which is here for the second time, is essential to an understanding of the issues. The plaintiffs are the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Billetter v. PosellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Halstead Lumber Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Hirsch v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Holly v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Theis v. duPont, Glore Forgan Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Phillips & Easton Supply Co. v. Eleanor International, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Steele v. J. I. Case Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API