People v. Dawkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Supreme Court, having been presented with conflicting affidavits and testimony from a confidential informant, was justified in finding that the newly discovered evidence was not credible and would not "create a probability that had such evidence been received at the trial the verdict would have been more favorable to the defendant” (CPL 330.30 [3]; see, People v Rodriguez, 193 AD2d 363, 366, lv denied 81 NY2d 1079;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Pearl Street Development Corp. v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. VassarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GreerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. Chavez-FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. ToumbisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.