Legal Opinion
People v. Chavez-Flores
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the motion to suppress footprint evidence, made for the first time during defendant’s second trial, was untimely (see, People v Sturgis, 112 AD2d 757, 757-758, lv denied 68 NY2d 817, 918). We reject the contention that defendant was denied a fair trial as the result of prosecutorial misconduct. The majority of the alleged instances of misconduct have not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. FalkensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. GoicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. PulleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. RussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002