Legal Opinion

United States v. Pinto, Biagio A/K/A Bob Pinto

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 10, 1981No. 80-2420PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Biagio Pinto, was charged in a three-count indictment with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b), 18 U.S.C. § 1014, and 18 U.S.C. § 1343, respectively. The district court jury returned a verdict of guilty on Counts 1 and 2 and not guilty on Count 3. 1 Defendant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment on Count 1 and five years’ probation on Count 2. We reverse defendant’s conviction and sentence under Count 1 because his conduct lies outside the scope of activity proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). We affirm his conviction on Count 2 and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. H. Wailen YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Mattie Doll Simmons, United States of America v. Maurice BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Allan BorenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API