United States v. Mattie Doll Simmons, United States of America v. Maurice Brown
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
The principal issue on this appeal is whether evidence of a comprehensive scheme to negotiate checks bearing forged signatures is encompassed within statutory language proscribing “takfing] and carr[ying] away, with intent to steal or purloin” property or money belonging to a federally insured bank. 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). We join those circuits representing the majority view and hold that such activity is covered by the statute. Finding the defendants’ remaining contentions to be without merit, we affirm their convictions.
II
Appellants Maurice Brown…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A "Red", John Hackett, A/K/A "Jack"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- United States v. Nicodemo Scarfo A/K/A "The Little Guy,"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.