Legal Opinion
United States v. Allan Boren
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2002No. 01-50083PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals the district court’s dismissal of two counts of an indictment alleging that Defendant Allan Boren made false statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. The statements were allegedly made in connection with a request to stop payment of an official bank check. The district court ruled that the first superseding indictment did not state an offense because it did not allege an intent to influence a lending activity. Because the statute criminalizes false statements in connection with any bank “application” or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. CovingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Lissette Christina NukidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Union Bank for Savings & InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Herbert VedermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Thomas Stanko MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. DossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.