Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony Larocca

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 20, 1981No. 77-1375, 77-1376PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

When this appeal first came to this court for review, United States v. Busic, 587 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1978), we considered the question of whether a court could validly impose consecutive sentences upon defendant LaRocca for the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon, 18 U.S.C. § 111, and for the crime of use of a firearm to commit that felony, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), when the dangerous weapon used in the assault is a firearm. We concluded that such sentenc ing violated the Double Jeopardy Clause and we remanded United States v. LaRocca, No. 77-1376,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Lam Kwong-Wah, United States of America v. Lam Kwong-Wah, United States of America v. Lam Kwong-WahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Dorothy JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API