Legal Opinion
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Phillips 66 Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 7, 1991No. Civ. A. H-90-2704PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAKE, District Judge.
This action involves the scope of arbitration under a Working Agreement between plaintiffs, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, and its Local 4-227 (“the Union”), and defendant, Phillips 66 Company. The Union alleges that Phillips 66 violated the Working Agreement by unilaterally enacting a substance control policy and seeks to compel arbitration of a grievance over the policy. Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment on the arbitrability of the grievance.
Phillips 66 has had a collective bargaining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Labor Relations Board v. The Columbus Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union No. 252, Subordinate to Ip& GcuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union and Its Local 4-227, Afl-Cio v. Phillips 66 CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers' International Union and Its Local 4-750 v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Phillips Petro. Co. v. Intern. Broth. of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Local No. 682District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Intern. Union v. Phillips 66 Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992