Phillips Petro. Co. v. Intern. Broth. of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Local No. 682
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Order
HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and Plaintiffs Cross Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Having considered the motions, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be denied, Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings should be denied, and Plaintiffs Cross Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings should be granted.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Phillips Petroleum Company (“Phillips”) filed a declaratory judgment action with respect to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Texas City Metal Trades Council v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2004