Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union and Its Local 4-227, Afl-Cio v. Phillips 66 Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Phillips 66 Company (“Phillips”) appeals from an order of the district court compelling it to arbitrate a grievance filed by the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union (“Union”), which alleged that Phillips’ substance control policy violated the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. Our decision today is controlled by United Steelworkers of Am. v. Asarco, Inc., 970 F.2d 1448 (5th Cir.1992), which held drug policy grievances arbitrable if such grievances emanate from a contract subject to arbitration. See id. at 1451. Therefore, because the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mario Alfonso Tagle and Lourdes A. Martinez v. Donald T. Regan, as Secretary of Treasury of the United States, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Asarco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Phillips 66 Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
3Cited by20 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 21 v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Prevot v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Buckley v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- Quinn v. EMC Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Cline v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.