Legal Opinion

Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2000No. 98-1128PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gonzales

This case raises the question whether a plaintiff may bring separate actions for separate latent occupational diseases caused by exposure to asbestos. Specifically, we must decide whether the single action rule or the statute of limitations bars Henry Pustejovsky, who settled an asbestosis suit with one defendant in 1982, from bringing suit against different defendants twelve years later for asbestos-related cancer. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants based on limitations. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that under the single action rule, Pustejovsky⅛ cause of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. DaccachTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Yancy v. United Surgical Partners International, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2007

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API