CSR LTD. v. Link
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice
in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, HECHT, CORNYN, ENOCH, OWEN and ABBOTT, JJ., join.
This original proceeding concerns the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation by Texas courts. Although mandamus does not ordinarily lie from the denial of a special appearance, exceptional circumstances may warrant this extraordinary relief. In this case, we find that mandamus is appropriate and conditionally grant the writ.
I
CSR Limited is a corporation organized under the laws of New South Wales, Australia, with its principal place of business in Sydney, Australia. For a period of time…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by741 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- American Type Culture Collection, Inc. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
736 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.