Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Aquabrom, Division of Great Lakes Chemical Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1988No. 77-1732PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
This seemingly endless labor dispute has now managed to reach this court in one form or another for the fourth, and we hope, final time. The current posture of the ease is essentially the same as it was three years ago when the case was last before us. Specifically, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) seeks to have respondents Aquabrom, Division of Great Lakes Chemical Corp. and Tesco Chemical, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (collectively referred to as “Great Lakes” or “the Com*1176pany”), as successors to the Bromine…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. DeBarteloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- National Labor Relations Board v. AquabromCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Trustees of the Fulton Fish Market Pension Fund v. M. Slavin & Sons, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024