Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Aquabrom

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1988No. 77-1732Published

1Opinion of the Court

855 F.2d 1174

129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2138, 57 USLW 2179,

109 Lab.Cas. P 10,689

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,

v.

AQUABROM, DIVISION OF GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION, as

successor to Bromine Division, Drug Research,

Inc.; Tesco Chemicals, Respondent.

No. 77-1732.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Aug. 28, 1987.

Decided Aug. 24, 1988.

Lawrence Scoville, argued, Suanne Trimmer, Clark, Klein & Beaumont, Detroit, Mich., Robert Brigham, West LaFayette, Ind., for respondent.

Bernard Jeweler, Contempt Litigation, Elliott Moore, Paul Spielberg, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API