Legal Opinion

Pettibone v. Tyson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 30, 2001No. 1981561PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

Plaintiff Jerome Pettibone appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant coemployee Dwayne Tyson on Pettibone’s claim that §§ 25-5-ll(b) and 25-5-11(c)(2), Ala.Code 1975, made Tyson liable for his failure to maintain and/or to repair the brakes on their employer’s van.1 We address Pettibone’s objection to a jury instruction that increased the scienter essential to his cause of action against Tyson.

Pettibone sued Tyson under § 25-5-11(b), which provides in pertinent part:

“(b) If personal injury or death to any employee results from the willful conduct, as defined in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Bailey v. HoggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Nunn v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte CanadaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API