Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2017No. 15-16173PublishedCited by 583 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge Berzon
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion and concurrence filed October 20, 2017, and appearing at 873 F.3d 1103, is hereby amended. An amended opinion and concurrence is filed herewith. Judges Berzon and Murguia have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge McCalla so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED (Doc. 57).
No further petitions for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by583 opinions
- Tamara Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- M. S. v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jamie Huber v. Simons Agency IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- Shavonda Hawkins v. the Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
578 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.