Legal Opinion
Grange v. Judah Boas Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1923No. Civ. No. 4365PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The trial court awarded a money judgment against the defendant and the defendant has appealed and has brought up a bill of exceptions.
An understanding of the points made requires that we go back to the year 1912 to commence. In that year R. B. Han-ford, W. S. Tevis, and the Hanford Investment Company were each engaged in the business of dealing in securities. The Hanford Investment Company had three directors, the two individuals just named, and Miss O’Connell. At that time, and during the years following, Mr. Tevis was president and Mr. Hanford was vice-president, or Mr. Hanford was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- National Bank of San Mateo v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Black v. Harrison Home Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rapp v. Fred W. Hauger Motors Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Phelps v. American Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.