Legal Opinion
McNamara v. Picken
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 21, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1051PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Count Two (May 20, 2013 [ECF No. 83] (“Mot.”)). For the reasons stated below, and based on the pretrial status conference held on June 20, 2013, defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The relevant factual background was laid out in this Court’s earlier opinion ruling on defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. McNamara v. Picken, 866 F.Supp.2d 10, 13-14 (D.D.C.2012).
ANALYSIS
Defendants seek summary judgment on Count…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltimore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Crown Life Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- McNamara v. PickenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Curaflex Health Services, Inc. v. BruniDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Cannon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Edwards v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Headfirst Baseball LLC v. ElwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- George C. Papageorge v. Jonathan Zucker & Patricia DausDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.