Legal Opinion

George C. Papageorge v. Jonathan Zucker & Patricia Daus

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2017No. 16-CV-226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beckwith, Associate Judge:

The appellant, George Papageorge, had a contract with his acquaintance, Matt Banks, that entitled Mr. Papageorge to most of the proceeds of a wrongful eviction claim Mr. Banks was pursuing. When that claim' was settled, Mr. Papageorge informed Mr. Banks’s lawyers, appellees Jonathan Zucker and Patricia Daus, of his purported right to the proceeds, and then sued them-for negligence and conversion when they disbursed the proceeds to. their client, Mr. Banks, instead of to Mr. Papag-eorge. The trial court dismissed Mr. Pa-pageorge’s claims, and we now affirm that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ayyildiz v. KiddSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  4. Solers, Inc. v. DoeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mark Shaffer v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  2. Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Miango v. Democratic Republic of CongoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Hoeft v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Krukas v. AarpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API