Legal Opinion

Estelle v. Gamble

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 30, 1976No. 75-929PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

429 U.S. 97 (1976)

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.

v.

GAMBLE.

No. 75-929.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 5, 1976.

Decided November 30, 1976.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Bert W. Pluymen, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for petitioners pro hac vice. With him on the brief were John L. Hill, Attorney General, David M. Kendall, First Assistant Attorney General, and Joe B. Dibrell, Jr., Assistant Attorney General.

Daniel K. Hedges, by appointment of the Court, 425 U. S. 932, argued the cause and filed a brief for…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Marshall; Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Shorter v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. (HC) Thompson v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PC) Acquah v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (PC) Alford v. SchumakerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API