Legal Opinion

(HC) Thompson v. Spearman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 3, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02328Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KANE MICHAEL THOMPSON, No. 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 M.E. SPEARMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an 18 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1). The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302. 21 Before this court is respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. (ECF No. 9). For the 22 reasons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API