Legal Opinion

(PC) Acquah v. Baughman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 5, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01470Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH ALLAN ACQUAH, No. 2:19-cv-1470 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Plaintiff’s complaint was filed here on July 31, 2019. However, the complaint is dated August 19 15, 2019, after its filing here, and it is not signed. 20 The court cannot consider unsigned filings, and the complaint must therefore be stricken 21 from the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); E.D. Cal. R.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API