Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Scollick v. Narula
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1339PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This case was brought by plaintiff-relator Andrew Scollick against eighteen defendants for violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) in connection with a scheme to obtain certain set-aside government contracts through fraudulent means. The United States has declined to intervene in this matter. See Notice, ECF No. 6. The following defendants have moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim: Hudson Insurance Co., Hanover Insurance Co., Centennial Surety Associates, Inc., Michael Schendel, Ajay K. Madan, Vijay…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Richard Williams v. Martin-Baker Aircraft Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States ex rel. Riedel v. Bos. Heart Diagnostics Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bailey v. Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Glycobiosciences, Inc. v. Vichy Laboratories, SaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- O'Connor v. US Cellular CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.