Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 13, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-2312Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. THOMAS BAILEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-2312 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell VETERANS MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas Bailey brought this action, as a relator, pursuant to the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), against Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc. (“VMTS”) and its owners and officers, Steven Rose, Michael Dortch, and David Bradford (“Individual VMTS Defendants,” and with VMTS, “VMTS…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.