Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 7, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2020-2070Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., MARK J. O’CONNOR and SARA F. LIEBMAN, Plaintiff-Relators, No. 20-cv-2070 (TSC) v. U.S. CELLULAR CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, Relators Mark O’Connor and Sara Liebman allege that U.S. Cellular Corporation—acting through its proxy, Allison DiNardo, and a sham company, Advantage Spectrum, L.P.—purchased spectrum licenses at auctions conducted by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) using nearly $113 million in fraudulently…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API