Legal Opinion

Glycobiosciences, Inc. v. Vichy Laboratories, Sa

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 11, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1264Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GLYCOBIOSCIENCES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-1264 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell VICHY LABORATORIES, S.A. and L’ORÉAL, S.A. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Glycobiosciences, Inc., a Canadian cosmetic and pharmaceutical company, owns two patented formulae that are allegedly being infringed by Vichy Laboratories, S.A. and L’Oréal, S.A. (collectively, “defendants”). 1 Plaintiff sued defendants, alleging claims of patent infringement. See

35 U.S.C. §101

et. seq. Defendants now move to dismiss, claiming,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API