Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Romine

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1884No. 11,579PublishedCited by 42 opinions

From the Superior Court of Allen County.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellees recovered a judgment against the appellants for an assault and battery, with $500 damages.

The following errors are assigned:

1. Overruling a motion for a venire de novo.

2. Overruling a motion for a new trial.

3. Overruling a motion in arrest of judgment.

The appellees assign the following cross error, to wit: Permitting the appellants to file their bill of exceptions after the time given therefor had expired.

The record shows that sixty days time was given, within which to prepare and file the bill of exceptions, and that on the sixtieth day the bill was presented to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rudolph v. LandwerlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Maple v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Rogers v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Williams v. PotterIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Toney v. ToneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Brooks v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Slater v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Brattain v. HerronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API